Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > Management, Networking, Logging and Reporting

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 108
Default [7.402] 2 adresses on network-card and VLAN?

Hi,

My scenario:

2 companies in the same building. We want to share internet, but don't want to share the same ip to the internet or same lan. I have a Intel Quad card in ASG, and wonder if the following is possible:

* Create two separate ip's on one (1) physical network card (WAN). Using additional adress option??
* Create two different local networks on two physical ports of networkcard.

IE: eth0 = lan1, masqed to ip1 on WAN
eth1 = lan2, maswed to ip2 on WAN

* Use VLAN to separate the two local networks.

Is this possible like above, or can it be done in some other way?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 07:05 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,954
Default

I'm not sure why you would need VLANs - seems like an unnecessary complication as you do have enough ports to do what you want.

I'm thinking that you can't do this though until V7.5 arrives.

Maybe you could put a switch in front of the Astaro, then use two separate Ethernet ports for the two public IPs. That way you can at least masquerade each separate internal network to a separate public IP (interface).

I can't remember, but it also seems like there might be an issue with the HTTP Proxy.

I hope others can help.

Cheers - Bob
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 10:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 108
Default

Hi,

Sorry, i forgot to tell the status of the ports. There's only 1 port free on the Quad. Currently using eth0 (lan), eth1 (WAN), eth2 (DMZ).

So i would need to get this going with only one free port.

Is this still possible some way? I haven't tried the option with additional adress on a port. Would it work the way i want?

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 11:28 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,954
Default

Please refer to the link provided.
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 01:03 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: southern California
Posts: 4,928
Default

Can't you use the 4th NIC port for the new LAN?

As Bob said, Masquerading to a second IP won't work until 7.5.

VLANs work fine though; see my sig below.

Barry
__________________
http://DealBert.net
Home & business end-user since v1.x
  • ASL 6.3x, HP DL145 Dual Opteron, 1GB RAM, 6 gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.3x, Dell PE1550 Dual PIII 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 2 NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.501, 17-watt fanless mini-ITX system: MSI IM-945GSE-A Atom n270, 2GB RAM, Morex T3310 case. 2 Intel GigE, 3 VLANs. 80G 5200rpm 2.5" HD
    Netgear GS108T gigE VLAN switch & Linksys WRT54G WAP
    Total network infrastructure: 27 watts. 100-IP Home User. FiOS 10mb/2mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.