Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > Network Security: Firewall, NAT, QoS, IPS and more
Reload this Page 7.2 SMB slow in one direction
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2008, 04:38 PM
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16
Default 7.2 SMB slow in one direction
Hi,
after the upgrade to 7.2 SMB-Access is very slow in one direction. The Upgrade has been the only change, the ruleset is the same. Transfers from server to client are working with 4 to 5 MB per second, Uploads run at ~200kB/s and the CPU-Load is 100%. Pausing the upload CPU-load drops to normal rates (~20%).

I'm still looking for the error / solution.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 07:58 AM
Moderator
  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: southern California
Posts: 5,359
Default
Try disabling all iPS features, including IM protection, ...

Barry
__________________
http://DealBert.net
Home & business end-user since v1.x
  • ASL 6.3x, HP DL145 Dual Opteron, 1GB RAM, 6 gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, HP DL360G5, Xeon 5160, 3GB, RAID, gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, 17-watt fanless mini-ITX system: MSI IM-945GSE-A Atom n270, 2GB RAM, Morex T3310 case. 2 Intel GigE, 3 VLANs. 80G 5200rpm 2.5" HD
    Netgear GS108T gigE VLAN switch & Linksys WRT54G WAP
    Total network infrastructure: 27 watts. 100-IP Home User. FiOS 10mb/2mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 04:48 PM
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16
Default
Nope, didnt' help. Disabled as much as possible. No proxies, no IDS/IPS, just the pure firewall rules. Man, searching for network errors sucks...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:18 AM
Moderator
  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: southern California
Posts: 5,359
Default
Have you run TOP on the firewall to see what is using the CPU during the transfers?

Note that the IPS is also used if you have IM or P2P security enabled.

Barry
__________________
http://DealBert.net
Home & business end-user since v1.x
  • ASL 6.3x, HP DL145 Dual Opteron, 1GB RAM, 6 gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, HP DL360G5, Xeon 5160, 3GB, RAID, gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, 17-watt fanless mini-ITX system: MSI IM-945GSE-A Atom n270, 2GB RAM, Morex T3310 case. 2 Intel GigE, 3 VLANs. 80G 5200rpm 2.5" HD
    Netgear GS108T gigE VLAN switch & Linksys WRT54G WAP
    Total network infrastructure: 27 watts. 100-IP Home User. FiOS 10mb/2mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:05 AM.

 
Contact Us - Astaro User Bulletin Board - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.