Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > Network Security: Firewall, NAT, QoS, IPS and more

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 17
Default Restrict IPS

Greetings,
Is there any way to turn off IPS for a specific service or machine?

Situation:
Client has ASG220 running IPS. They have a FTP/SFTP (SSH) server running on the LAN that is NAT'd with an additional IP address on the WAN interface. This server cannot be moved from the LAN, due to time-sensitive proprietary software which relies on file transfers being stored on a network share on the LAN (in other words, moving the server to a DMZ then synching the data to the LAN won't work).

This server is responsible for more than 50% of the traffic going through the Astaro. When IPS is running, remote FTP users complain of slow or dropped transfers. With IPS turned off the performance improves significantly.

I'm basically looking for a way to exclude IPS scanning from the FTP/SSH traffic running to this computer only. Is this possible? If not, does anyone have some suggestions for a work-around?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:38 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 5,307
Default

The best way to accomplish what you want would seem to be to add an Ethernet adapter to the server so that you can have both an address in a DMZ and an address in your internal network. Then, create an exception for Intrustion Prevention with a source of the server in the DMZ.

At present, it would seem that you could create an exception for Intrustion Prevention with a source of the server. Does that resolve your issue?
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2009, 06:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 17
Default

Good idea, that was what I was looking for!

Of course I now have two questions:

1. You presented two options - adding the second nic connected to a DMZ then creating an exception to the server vs. just creating the exception to the server. What does adding the second nic/DMZ accomplish vs. just doing the exception?

2. Under Attach Patterns | Attacks against servers | Misc. Servers I see FTP and SSH are selected. Would unchecking these options provide any advantage over creating the exception?

Thanks for the help!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:39 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: southern California
Posts: 5,116
Default

Hi,
Unchecking them would disable them for all internal and external networks.
If you don't want that, then create an exception.

Barry
__________________
http://DealBert.net
Home & business end-user since v1.x
  • ASL 6.3x, HP DL145 Dual Opteron, 1GB RAM, 6 gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.3x, Dell PE1550 Dual PIII 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 2 NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, 17-watt fanless mini-ITX system: MSI IM-945GSE-A Atom n270, 2GB RAM, Morex T3310 case. 2 Intel GigE, 3 VLANs. 80G 5200rpm 2.5" HD
    Netgear GS108T gigE VLAN switch & Linksys WRT54G WAP
    Total network infrastructure: 27 watts. 100-IP Home User. FiOS 10mb/2mb
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2009, 11:51 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 5,307
Default

Quote:
What does adding the second nic/DMZ accomplish vs. just doing the exception?
You can't run gigabit traffic through an ASG220. However, it seems like an unnecessary security risk to have a publicly-available FTP server inside your trusted network. A compromise is to have a DMZ IP and an internal LAN IP for the server; attempts to reach your LAN from the DMZ IP would be blocked. Of course, a very-motivated intruder could take the time to discover the other route into your LAN, but it's more likely that the bad-guy would be lazy and just move on to the next opportunity.

Anyway, just a thought.

Cheers - Bob
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.