Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > Network Security: Firewall, NAT, QoS, IPS and more

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2004, 03:04 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9
Default several DMZ\'s

I have a Astaro 4.0 box set up with 5 nic's. I have one public IP for the wan interface, and a public /27 range for dmz use... now I want 3 different DMZ's with one nic each. Could I use the same subnetmask for all 3 DMZ's? That would save me a couple IP's (if it would work at all), but is there a disadvantage in doing it this way?

Should I have separate ranges for each dmz?
Do I have to?

Any suggestions on how it should be done properly?
Any suggestions on how it could work with what I have today?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2004, 05:08 AM
Wizard
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,265
Default Re: several DMZ\'s

Maybe you mean to say "use the same network number"? The subnet mask merely dictates what portion of the network address is common on a LAN interface; DMZs can have the same subnet mask, but if they have different high order octets in their network number, they will not directly be talking to each other.

Since Astaro is a routing firewall, each interface is required to have a unique network number (actually, you can have duplicate network numbers on more than one interface, but the routing won't magically go across both interfaces since the firewall won't know which to take; well, at least in the current 4X version of Astaro...)

A common configuration is to have each DMZ on a different network number. So DMZ1=192.168.1.0/24, DMZ2=192.168.2.0/24, ..., with /24 being the same thing as subnet mask 255.255.255.0; 255 decimal=11111111 binary=8 one bits -How many high order one bits are in the subnet mask 255.255.255.0? 24)

Using DNAT rules on your external interface, you direct your scarce public Internet addresses to plentiful private ones on various DMZs. Example: blah.2 http will be redirected to 192.168.1.2, blah.3 smtp will be redirected to 192.168.2.2...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2004, 03:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 371
Default Re: several DMZ\'s

_curious_,
I think this link will help you!

Bagira
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2004, 03:24 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9
Default Re: several DMZ\'s

SecApp: I had to read your post 4 times before I could understand what you where saying. Probobly mostly because my native is not english [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
But at last it made sense to me [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

As you suggested the best way would probably be to use internal IP's for the dmz's and use NAT rules to route in the public IP I have available.

Thanx a lot for explaining so thoroughly [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

And bagira, thanx a lot for that link [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] that one came in handy, and I bet I'm going to use it more [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2004, 03:59 AM
Wizard
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,265
Default Re: several DMZ\'s

I can only imagine what this would be like for me if this was all in German!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.