Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > Network Security: Firewall, NAT, QoS, IPS and more

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2004, 08:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 19
Default IPTables question!

Hello everybody,
i have got a question about the routing process in iptables. i am currently working on a document for the university wich discribes a little firewall configuration with iptables. i am using the book linux-firewalls from Robert L. Zigler as a reference.

now my question. zigler discribes in his book a dual homed firewall. the interesting thing is, that he discribes that the firewall rules for the FORWARD chain define also the routing of the firewall. so he does not mention any word about ip_forward in /pric/sys/net/....
he says the only the firewall rules make the packets move from one interface to the oher. is that correct so? i searched many forums and howtos on the internet but i did not find anything that gives me a hint that that is correct. i thing ip_forwarding must be active. then it is right what ziegler is writing beause wihout a filter rule the routing from one interface to the oher is forbidden. with the rule it is allowed and so it can be done.

perhabes zigler wrote that because he uses redhat 7.2 as the basic distribution. does anyone know if ip_forward is activated by default on this distribution? that would explain ziegler.

thanks for your support

patrick
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2004, 10:12 AM
Wizard
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 998
Default Re: IPTables question!

in order to route packets ip forwarding must be enabled otherwise no data would be copied from one NIC to another. Nice idea disable routing, secure the login shell and have a proxy to connect to the web (or other ressources) add some INPUT packet filters... ready is poor man's firewall.

Without routing a FORWARD chain would be obsolete - IMHO :-)

read u
o|iver


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.