|
|
|||
|
Hello,
I am trying to create a IPSEC tunnel between Astaro firewall and a DFL-210 firewall. ........................................ A Side - DFL-210: Net: 10.0.2.0/24 Authentication: PSK key (ASCII) Encryption IPSEC: Blowfish 128 Encryption IKE: Blowfish + MD5 IKE (DH GROUP) 5: 1536BIT ........................................ B Side - Astaro: Net: 192.168.10.0/24 Authentication: PSK key (ASCII) Encryption IPSEC: Blowfish 128 Encryption IKE: Blowfish + MD5 IKE (DH GROUP) 5: 1536BIT ........................................ - I belive i have made all changes neccesary but the tunnel will not work/come online on the Astaro. - It looks great on the DLINK DFL-210 firewall, the tunnel seems to be up there. - This is the log from the Astaro: 2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+UP to replace #57 {using isakmp#4} 2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:24 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:26 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:30 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:38 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:36:54 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN 2008:11:14-13:37:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received and ignored informational message 2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_QUICK_I1. No acceptable response to our first Quick Mode message: perhaps peer likes no proposal 2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: starting keying attempt 55 of an unlimited number 2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #59: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+UP to replace #58 {using isakmp#4} 2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:34 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:36 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:40 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client 2008:11:14-13:37:48 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client Strange thing here is that we are not using XAUTH? why is that showing up here in this log? Could be this that is causing the trouble ? ![]() But we did not find any setting within the Astaro were we could disable this. - Thanks for all help! Best regards, Johan |
|
|||
|
- Thanks for reply!
![]() - My thought was that the XAUTH is causing the trouble on the ASTARO since this is not used. Will try to diable that and test, any other ideas thoughts on what the problem could be? - Thanks for any help on this, its quite urgent that i get this fixed. - Attaching debug log - screenshost. Best regards, Johan Last edited by mvg_johan; 11-18-2008 at 12:01 PM. |
|
||||
|
XAUTH support was added in the 7.300 release, our documentation may not have caught up yet.
__________________
Are you Linkedin to Astaro? http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/139679/189D6C60EC64 Random Rants from an InfoSec Curmudgeon, UnCommon Sense Security Blog http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com |
|
||||
|
Yes, Jack, but XAUTH is only supported under 'Remote Access' and not under 'Site-to-Site'. Is that a design issue?
If so, then might Johan try to resolve his problem by configuring a 'Respond only' tunnel under 'Remote Access' instead of as he's doing above? Or, do the logs indicate another problem? Cheers - Bob
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3 Addicted to my iPhone! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|