Astaro User Bulletin Board

Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Astaro Gateway Products > VPN: Site to Site and Remote Access

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2008, 11:56 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Question LAN-LAN Ipsec tunnel - problem

Hello,

I am trying to create a IPSEC tunnel between Astaro firewall and a DFL-210 firewall.

........................................

A Side - DFL-210:

Net: 10.0.2.0/24

Authentication: PSK key (ASCII)

Encryption IPSEC: Blowfish 128
Encryption IKE: Blowfish + MD5

IKE (DH GROUP) 5: 1536BIT
........................................

B Side - Astaro:

Net: 192.168.10.0/24

Authentication: PSK key (ASCII)

Encryption IPSEC: Blowfish 128
Encryption IKE: Blowfish + MD5

IKE (DH GROUP) 5: 1536BIT
........................................

- I belive i have made all changes neccesary but the tunnel will not work/come online on the Astaro.

- It looks great on the DLINK DFL-210 firewall, the tunnel seems to be up there.

- This is the log from the Astaro:

2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+UP to replace #57 {using isakmp#4}
2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:24 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:26 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:30 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:38 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:36:54 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
2008:11:14-13:37:23 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received and ignored informational message
2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_QUICK_I1. No acceptable response to our first Quick Mode message: perhaps peer likes no proposal
2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #58: starting keying attempt 55 of an unlimited number
2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #59: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+UP to replace #58 {using isakmp#4}
2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:33 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:34 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:36 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:40 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client
2008:11:14-13:37:48 (none) pluto[30631]: "S_Nacka_C_0" #4: received MODECFG message when in state STATE_MAIN_I4, and we aren't xauth client

Strange thing here is that we are not using XAUTH? why is that showing up here in this log?

Could be this that is causing the trouble ?

But we did not find any setting within the Astaro were we could disable this.

- Thanks for all help!

Best regards,
Johan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IPSec-Skarmdump-1.jpg (83.8 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg policies-inst-1.jpg (71.3 KB, 6 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 01:59 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 562
Default

There appears to be a conflict in the Astaro documentation.

In the config guide for the Astaro Secure Client, it is explicitly stated that the "ASG does not support XAUTH." However, in V7.3 'Remote Access >> IPSec', there is an 'Enable XAUTH' check box when you 'add IPSec remote access rule'.

Perhaps one of our Astaro friends can enlighten the rest of us.

Thanks - Bob
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2008, 11:51 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Default Thanks for reply

- Thanks for reply!

- My thought was that the XAUTH is causing the trouble on the ASTARO since this is not used.

Will try to diable that and test, any other ideas thoughts on what the problem could be?

- Thanks for any help on this, its quite urgent that i get this fixed.

- Attaching debug log - screenshost.

Best regards,
Johan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1-debug-log.jpg (98.1 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 2-debug-log.jpg (98.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 3-debug-log.jpg (96.9 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 4-debug-log.jpg (97.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 5-debug-log.jpg (99.4 KB, 3 views)

Last edited by mvg_johan; 11-18-2008 at 12:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:54 PM
Jack Daniel's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cape Cod, Mass, US
Posts: 303
Default

XAUTH support was added in the 7.300 release, our documentation may not have caught up yet.
__________________
Are you Linkedin to Astaro? http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/139679/189D6C60EC64

Random Rants from an InfoSec Curmudgeon, UnCommon Sense Security Blog http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 04:17 PM
BAlfson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 562
Default

Yes, Jack, but XAUTH is only supported under 'Remote Access' and not under 'Site-to-Site'. Is that a design issue?

If so, then might Johan try to resolve his problem by configuring a 'Respond only' tunnel under 'Remote Access' instead of as he's doing above?

Or, do the logs indicate another problem?

Cheers - Bob
__________________
ACE V7 - Astaro Preferred Partner since V3
Addicted to my iPhone!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.