Astaro User Bulletin Board
Go Back   Astaro User Bulletin Board > Closed Forums (read only) > ASG V7.200 BETA (closed)

Welcome to the Astaro User Bulletin Board.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 08:00 AM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Arrow [7.190] QOS & Bittorrent

Hi,

I tried to setup a QOS based on the Bittorrent traffic. And it doesn't limit the flow !!! Notice that AFC "see" the bittorrent flow ( it is shown in the im/P2P summarry)

You can see the QOS settings in the following jpg, and the real speed of µTorrent in the last JPG...

Remarks:
- The source Pc isn't in the skiplist
- The controlled network is ITF_LAN Network
- bittorrent is allowed in the Pafket filter rules
- I use a policy based routing to chnage the flow from the default gateway (ITF_BIDON which point to nothing (TEST about policy routing ;-) ) to the second real internet access ITF_FREE

bye
Ulong
Attached Images
File Type: jpg qos1.jpg (43.2 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg qos2.JPG (27.2 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg qos3.jpg (7.1 KB, 40 views)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2008, 08:42 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Default

Hi,

I redo the same test using 7.191, and i've the same problem (no limit)...
So it's allways open...

Ulong

Just another note : I try on an easy config ( limit newsgroup on 119/tcp) but it's the same : i can overcome the limit set is QOS...
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:19 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: southern California
Posts: 5,137
Default

I'm not sure how you've setup and tested, but the default QOS settings allow traffic to exceed the limits, IF there is extra bandwidth not being used by other traffic.

Barry
__________________
http://DealBert.net
Home & business end-user since v1.x
  • ASL 6.3x, HP DL145 Dual Opteron, 1GB RAM, 6 gigE NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.3x, Dell PE1550 Dual PIII 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 2 NICs, 50-IP Platinum License
  • ASL 7.5x, 17-watt fanless mini-ITX system: MSI IM-945GSE-A Atom n270, 2GB RAM, Morex T3310 case. 2 Intel GigE, 3 VLANs. 80G 5200rpm 2.5" HD
    Netgear GS108T gigE VLAN switch & Linksys WRT54G WAP
    Total network infrastructure: 27 watts. 100-IP Home User. FiOS 10mb/2mb
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 09:26 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Smile

Hi Barry,
Many thanks for your input,

I do the following test :

Launch an FTP connection at 800Ko/s (6400Kbits) which saturate my download at full speed...
and I activate in the QOS my newsgroup test which is set to min=110Kbits, max=1024Kbits

And with this I have the following result :
FTP slow down at 220Ko/s (1760Kbit...)
and my newsreader go at 4200 Kbit, 4* the max I set...

So even with an easy config I can't use a QOS...

Ulong
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 08:39 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Default

Hi

Now using V7.192, I've the same problem with QOS : the simple qos limit on newsgroup doesn't work, even if I allocate all the bandwidth with another transfer...

Ulong.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 10:02 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Default

Hi

As I can see in the screenshot, you configured the QoS on your External interface (ITF_Free). The QoS rules which are configured here, just limit the bandwidth for your upload.
If you want to limit the download bandwidth, you need to configure the QoS rule at the internal interface (ITF_LAN). You can switch them in the drop-down-menu at the top.

At my machine the download bandwidth is limited, even with AFC enabled and Bittorrent set to 'Log'.

Malte
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:12 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Talking

Hi Malte,

Excuse me for the mistake : you are right : my qos was in the wrong interface...
I correct the mistake and it work fine for my test using newsgroups !!!...

But for the P2P using bittorrent it is not the same :
I set the selector to 800Kbit ( 100Ko)...
and i get more than 230Ko (1800Kbit) , and 280Ko (2240Kbit)
So it's quite different...

if I deactivate my selector I have quite same speed...
So it's better but it's not 100% good...

ulong
Attached Images
File Type: jpg qos4.jpg (6.6 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg qos5.jpg (44.3 KB, 20 views)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:25 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Default

Hi,

I have redone the test using V7.193:
Even with a QOS at 100Ko, µTorrent is able to go up to 400Ko...

So it is same as before...

Ulong
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Default

Hi Ulong,

i am sorry but i can't reproduce your problem. Even when i force encrypted peers the QoS works fine. I tried now with utorrent 1.7.7
Can you send me a backup from your ASG for a look?

Greetz
Malte
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:47 PM
ulong's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
Default

Hi Malte,

I can give you a backup if you want (give me your email in a private message),
Or you can log in directly on this box, "Marcel" has all the necessary login/ip etc (it was for the problem in a weekly/daily report)...

Ulong.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


These pages are specifically maintained for the discussion of firewall issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases. issues within the Open Source community, and might already reflect new alpha/beta releases under development. Please refer to our product specifications for the functionality of the actual release. Discussions of new/enhanced functionality does not constitute a commitment of Astaro, to integrate this functionality into future releases.